Security Team Risk Assessment Tool
CISO's Rapid Assessment Platform
How the Security Team Analyzer Works
The Security Team Analyzer is a comprehensive assessment tool designed to help CISOs and security leaders evaluate their security team's readiness against 2026's threat landscape — including AI-augmented adversaries, autonomous attack tooling, nation-state actors, and the post-quantum cryptography transition.
Our assessment methodology is based on research with leading security organizations and best practices for building resilient security teams that can withstand next-generation threats, including the security of AI and agentic systems your organization depends on.
Assessment Framework
Skills & Capabilities
Evaluates your team's technical expertise across critical security domains including AppSec, Cloud Security, OT/ICS, Network Security and Threat Intelligence.
Team Resilience
Assesses your team's ability to maintain effectiveness during high-stress scenarios, extended incidents, and their resistance to psychological manipulation tactics.
Insider Risk Controls
Evaluates controls implemented to mitigate insider risks within the security organization itself, including least privilege access and separation of duties.
Adversary Focus
Measures your preparedness for targeted attacks against security personnel, including counter-intelligence awareness and monitoring for compromise.
Organizational Alignment
Evaluates how well your security team is aligned with business objectives and whether you have appropriate executive support.
Incident Response
Assesses your team's ability to effectively detect, respond to, and remediate sophisticated cyber threats — including AI-automated intrusions that adapt TTPs faster than signature-based detection.
AI & Agentic System Risk
Evaluates your team's readiness to secure AI and agentic systems — including LLM integrations, autonomous workflow agents, post-quantum cryptography transition readiness, and defensive capabilities against adversarial AI attacks such as prompt injection, model poisoning, and AI red teaming.
Scoring Methodology
Each assessment area includes 5 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree). Your responses are calculated into percentage scores for each category:
Your team demonstrates excellent capabilities in this area
Your team has solid foundations but room for improvement
Your team has basic capabilities but significant gaps exist
Critical vulnerabilities exist in your security team structure
The tool generates tailored recommendations based on your score in each category, focusing on the most critical areas for improvement to enhance your team's resilience against advanced threats.
Staffing Analysis
Our staffing analysis evaluates your security team structure against industry benchmarks and identifies:
- Missing Essential Roles - Critical security positions that should be prioritized for hiring
- Knowledge Concentration Risks - Areas where critical knowledge is concentrated in a single person
- Overwork Risks - Roles where personnel are likely overworked and at risk of burnout
- Industry Benchmark Gaps - How your staffing compares to industry standards for your organization size
The analysis provides an overall risk assessment (Low, Medium, High, or Critical) based on the number and severity of identified issues.
Historical Trends
The historical trends analysis allows you to track improvements in your security team structure over time, focusing on:
- Reduction in the number of missing essential roles
- Improvements in knowledge distribution across the team
- Better workload balancing to prevent burnout
Based on Industry Standards
Our methodology incorporates guidance from industry frameworks including NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE ATLAS (AI/ML adversary tactics), NIST AI RMF, NIST PQC standards (FIPS 203/204/205), and current research on AI-augmented advanced persistent threats. The assessment is regularly updated to reflect the evolving 2026 threat landscape.
OUR PARTNERS
